An Open Letter to Government Authorities
and the International Community

I. Gratitude and Purpose

First and foremost, we wish to express our deepest respect and sincere gratitude to every individual who takes the time to read this letter. We understand that your daily responsibilities are immense, and that our correspondence may have added to your already considerable workload. For this, we sincerely apologize for any inconvenience.

Whether you have read our materials in their entirety, forwarded a single email to a colleague, or merely noted a case number in your records — we are profoundly grateful. Every act of good faith, no matter how small it may seem, is an indispensable link in the chain of justice. We recognize the value of your time, your attention, and your willingness to engage with the concerns of ordinary citizens.

We must state with absolute clarity: this letter is not directed against any country, any government, any department, any organization, or any individual. We do not seek confrontation. We do not wish to undermine any institution. We harbor no desire to defame anyone. We have one purpose, and one purpose only —

II. The Origin: One Forged Contract

Everything traces back to a single contract forged in 2006.

The collective forest land belonging to Group 3 of Taiyun Village, Gaojia Town, Fengdu County, Chongqing Municipality, was allegedly seized by Qin Dawu through a land transfer contract bearing the forged signatures of deceased villagers. People who had already passed away were made to "sign" a document that transferred their community's ancestral land to a private mining operation.

This single fraudulent document became the cornerstone upon which every subsequent illegal act was built over the following twenty years. It was on the basis of this allegedly forged contract that Qin Dawu and his company — Chongqing Lvdaoyuan Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. (Unified Social Credit Code: 91500230774891898M) — obtained:

1. Mining permits authorizing extraction operations
2. Forestry use permits authorizing the clearing of collective forest land
3. Safety production permits authorizing large-scale blasting operations
4. All other operating licenses necessary to run a mining enterprise

Every facade of legality was constructed upon this allegedly fraudulent foundation. When the foundation is false, everything built upon it is false. When the root is poisoned, every branch it produces is tainted.

III. The Cascading Consequences

From that single forged contract in 2006, the following chain of alleged crimes unfolded:

1. Fraudulent Permits

Mining permits, forestry permits, and safety certificates were all allegedly obtained on the basis of a contract bearing the signatures of dead people. If the underlying contract is fraudulent, every permit derived from it is invalid, and every operation conducted under those permits is illegal.

2. Mining 6.6 Times Beyond Approved Limits

Approved for 272 acres of mining, the operation allegedly destroyed over 1,800 acres — approximately 6.6 times the authorized area. An entire mountain has physically disappeared over the course of twenty years. This is not a metaphor. This is a geographical fact that can be verified in thirty seconds by anyone on Earth using any satellite map application.

3. Destruction of National Forest Resources

Approximately 1,800 acres of collective forest land were allegedly seized through the forged contract and subsequently destroyed through mining operations. Forests that took generations to grow have been obliterated. Soil erosion has accelerated. Ecosystems have been irreversibly damaged. This is not merely a local issue — these are the nation's resources, the inheritance of future generations, and the lungs of our shared Earth.

4. Pollution Affecting 100,000 Residents

Massive open-pit blasting operations have allegedly generated persistent dust clouds that affect the respiratory health and daily lives of approximately 100,000 residents in Gaojia Town and surrounding communities. Homes have been structurally damaged by the concussive force of industrial-scale explosions.

5. At Least Three Deaths

Safety incidents and related conflicts at the mining site have reportedly claimed at least three lives. Not a single person has been held accountable for these deaths. Three human beings — three families left without answers, without justice, without so much as an acknowledgment.

6. Deliberate Deception of Inspectors

The mining site was reportedly covered with green camouflage netting designed to simulate natural vegetation when viewed from above or via satellite imagery. This allegedly constitutes the systematic and premeditated deception of environmental inspection teams and government oversight bodies.

7. Retaliation Against Whistleblowers

Over the course of twenty years, villagers who dared to report these alleged crimes reportedly faced threats, harassment, intimidation, and even detention. The fundamental principle of justice has been inverted: those who allegedly committed the crimes walk free, while those who reported the crimes face punishment.

IV. The Question We Cannot Answer

The government is already in possession of these facts.

The evidence is conclusive and independently verifiable. Satellite imagery can be checked by any person on Earth with an internet connection. The original contracts exist in physical form. The court case number is a matter of public record. These are not rumors, hearsay, or partisan allegations. They are objective, verifiable facts.

The nation has lost land. It has lost forests. It has lost irreplaceable natural resources. The health of 100,000 residents has been compromised. The rights of an entire village have been trampled. At least three lives have been silently extinguished. And the person allegedly responsible for all of this has not only escaped accountability for twenty years — they have grown wealthier and more powerful with each passing year.

A few individuals allegedly profiting from crime for two decades without facing a single consequence. How can any nation that respects the rule of law tolerate this? How can any legal system permit it?

We believe in the law. We believe in the stated resolve of the central government to combat corruption and protect the environment. We believe in the integrity and professionalism of the vast majority of public servants. What we find impossible to believe is that a county-level protection network can permanently shield the truth from the light.

V. Our Demands

Our demands are simple and proportionate — neither more nor less than what justice requires:

1. Forensic examination of the 2006 contract. The signatures on the land transfer contract should be subjected to independent forensic analysis to determine their authenticity. If forgery is confirmed, all permits and licenses obtained on the basis of that contract should be revoked in accordance with applicable law.
2. A formal criminal investigation into the alleged illegal mining. The actual area of mining operations should be surveyed and compared against the approved area. All persons found responsible for violations should be held legally accountable.
3. An independent investigation into the alleged environmental pollution, safety violations, and related deaths. The victims and their families deserve answers, accountability, and justice.
4. Protection of whistleblowers' legal rights. In accordance with Article 41 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China and the Regulations on Petitions and Complaints, no citizen should face retaliation for exercising their lawful right to report suspected criminal activity.

We do not seek special treatment. We do not demand financial compensation. We do not pursue personal gain of any kind. We ask only for one thing: equality before the law. When the law has been broken, accountability must follow.

VI. Closing Words

We wish to express our deepest and most sincere gratitude to every person who has engaged with this case in any capacity:

To every public servant who quietly upholds justice at their post — we see you, and we are grateful. To every person who forwarded these materials to a colleague, a supervisor, or a friend — your small act of conscience has meaning beyond what you may realize. To every journalist, scholar, lawyer, and member of civil society who works to ensure that the powerful are held accountable — it is because of you that the world has not been entirely consumed by silence.

We understand that justice does not always arrive on the schedule we desire. But we have faith that it arrives. Even if this letter does not produce immediate results, we are certain of one thing:

This evidence is now part of the permanent public record. It is preserved in digital form across multiple independent platforms. It can be accessed by anyone, anywhere, at any time. It cannot be deleted, confiscated, or destroyed. It will wait — patiently and indefinitely — for the right moment and the right person.

Perhaps it will be a newly appointed county official who reopens old files. Perhaps it will be an investigative journalist who stumbles upon our website. Perhaps it will be an environmental inspection team that finds our report during the next round of oversight. Perhaps it will be an intern sorting through complaint letters who is stopped cold by the phrase "signatures of deceased villagers."

However and whenever that moment comes, the evidence will be ready.

VII. Independent Verification

Every claim in this letter can be independently verified. You do not need to trust us. You need only trust your own eyes.